The growing gap in voter behaviour
Frank Graves, president of EKOS Research Associates, opened the door on the growing gap between the world of the voter and the world of the non-voter, two worlds with boundaries etched increasingly by telephone usage and, most important, age. Election 2011 revealed a voting fault line delineated by a generation gap.
On one side of the gap: Canadians over 45 enthusiastically favouring the Conservatives, with a likelihood of voting starting at about 60 per cent and rising with age to more than 80 per cent.
On the other side: younger Canadians generally disliking the Conservatives, but with a voting likelihood of at most 40 per cent, decreasing to about 30 per cent for the youngest electoral cohort, those under the age of 25.
The proportion of Canadians who vote has always increased with age, but the differential has never been as great as it is now. In addition, the values gulf between young and old probably has never been greater. And the demographic skewing of the population – proportionately so many older people – is almost certainly unprecedented.
Do democratic government systems create democracy? What could contribute to improving how our democratic systems work? Is democracy possible in a community? Is democracy having a vote or a voice? Who should have a voice? Who should have a vote if needed? How do we improve our ability to contribute our voice to our community enterprise?
If community democracy serves interests we have in common as a community, how does that relate to our common identity as a community, who we are, our culture, and our common enterprise?
How could democracy be defined? What systems could contribute to improving our ability to create democracy?
What Democracy Needs
The societies we are striving to create — free, democratic, willing to some degree to share equally — require strong identification on the part of their citizens.
A citizen democracy can only work if most of its members are convinced that their political society is a common venture of considerable moment, and believe it to be of vital importance that they participate in the ways they must to keep it functioning as a democracy.
This means not only a commitment to the common project, but also a special sense of bonding among people working together in this project. This is perhaps the point at which most contemporary democracies threaten to fall apart.
A citizen democracy is highly vulnerable to the alienation which arises from deep inequalities and the sense of neglect and indifference that easily arises among abandoned minorities.
This means they must be capable of adopting policies with redistributive effect, and to some extent also with redistributive intent. And such policies require a high degree of mutual commitment.
Where we are now
We do not have the ability to contribute our point of view to our community, our community leaders, and our government leaders and decision-makers.
Making informed choices requires literacy, the ability to understand communications, the ability to make informed choices, and the ability to contribute to the conversation
The politics of our democratic government systems contribute to creating us and them and to the idea of a democracy as a choice between us or them.
The idea of a democracy is that our government institutions and our elected and appointed governing officials represent and make decisions in the interests of the community of common interest they serve.
If people seeking to be our elected representatives do not give us the information we need about their experience, their interests, and their ideas, we can not make informed choices.
What we can do
We cannot easily change our government systems. We can change the way we govern ourselves. We can change the way we respond to the behaviour and decisions of citizens who take or are given power over our government – over our laws and our investments in our safety, our health, our education, and our well-being, – over our common resources held in trust for our community, – and over our relationships with other communities.
We can explore how we create democracy in communities who demonstrate an interest in the idea, – communities who are creating governing structures and processes that give community contributors a voice, and a vote if needed, in communities of common enterprise and in community enterprises pursuing common interests.
We can explore ideas on how we could become informed and more able to express our point of view
Where we are now – the questions
Where we are now – contributions
Ideas for creative exploration
150 cultures that contributed to our ideas of democracy
150 events that contributed to the evolution of our democratic systems
150 ideas that contribute to the idea of democracy
150 ideas that could contribute to creating democracy
Contributors to the conversation
UBC Centre for the Study of Democratic Institutions
Democracy is much more than a way of making governments responsive to the wishes of the people. Well-designed and innovative democratic institutions can and do reduce violence and deprivation, and increase freedom, diversity, tolerance, education, health, social innovation, cultural creativity, and economic development.
UBC Centre for the Study of Democratic Institutions
Democracy Now!’s War and Peace Report provides our audience with access to people and perspectives rarely heard in the U.S.corporate-sponsored media, including independent and international journalists, ordinary people from around the world who are directly affected by U.S. foreign policy, grassroots leaders and peace activists, artists, academics and independent analysts.
Community Government Centre
Creating Our Government Systems
Centre for Community Journalism
Creating Our legal Systems
Centre for Literacy